Please access the step-by-step tutorials for performing analyses similar to those described in our paper in Nature Comm. (Feb, 2015).
Epigenome TutorialThe Epigenomic Data Slice tool provides read information for a given sample and set of regions. Users can use the tab-delimited output file, which contains average signals of an epigenomic mark over a given set of regions of interest, for further off-line analysis. For example, users can use this information for generating a read density plot at the transcription start sites.
The Heatmap tool computes the similarity between datasets based on epigenomic signal. Several distance metric options are available to calculate the similarity between datasets and results are presented visually as a heatmap.
Spark is a visualization tool that employs clustering (k-means) of epigenomic data, such as chromatin marks from Chip-Seq experiments. The visualization allows one to examine epigenomic patterns across multiple datasets in a genome-wide perspective, while also enabling one to drill down to specific individual loci.
ChromHMM is a tool for learning and characterizing chromatin states (e.g., active transcription start sites (TSS), active enhancers, etc.). ChromHMM LearnModel uses binarized data files and learns a chromatin state model. It generates both the learned chromatin-state model parameters and the chromatin-state assignments for each genomic position.
HOMER (Hypergeometric Optimization of Motif Enrichment) is a motif discovery algorithm designed to find enriched motifs for a set of genomic regions.
GREAT (Genomic Regions Enrichment of Annotations Tool) is another enrichment tool that assigns biological meaning to a set of non-coding genomic regions by performing gene ontological (GO) enrichment analysis of nearby genes.
LIMMA (Linear Model for Microarray Analysis) is a tool that performs signal comparison of next-gen sequencing data and outputs the differences in signal intensity between samples of interest. This allows one to determine differences between samples (i.e., control muscle versus treated muscle). Differences may include differential methylation (if MeDIP input) or gene expression level (if RNA-seq input).
The International Human Epigenome Consortium: A Blueprint for Scientific Collaboration and Discovery
Cell. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.007 (2016)
PMID: 27863232
Epigenomic Deconvolution of Breast Tumors Reveals Metabolic Coupling between Constituent Cell Types
Cell Rep. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.057 (2016)
PMID: 27851969
Nat. Commun. 6:6370 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7370 (2015)
PMID: 25691256
Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes
Nature doi: 10.1038/nature14248 (2015)
PMID: 25693563
BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15 Suppl 7:S2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-S7-S2. Epub 2014 May 28.
PMID: 25080362
Comparison and quantitative verification of mapping algorithms for whole-genome bisulfite sequencing
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Apr;42(6):e43. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1325. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
PMID: 24391148
Recommendations for the design and analysis of epigenome-wide association studies
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):949-55. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2632. Review.
PMID: 24076989
PLoS Genet. 2013;9(2):e1003333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003333. Epub 2013 Feb 28. No abstract available.
PMID: 23468659
Spark: a navigational paradigm for genomic data exploration
Genome Res. 2012 Nov;22(11):2262-9. doi: 10.1101/gr.140665.112. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
PMID: 22960372
Genome Biol. 2012 Jun 15;13(6):R43. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-r43.
PMID: 22703893
PLoS Genet. 2012;8(5):e1002692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002692. Epub 2012 May 17.
PMID: 22615578
Emerging patterns of epigenomic variation
Trends in Genetics, 2011 Jun;27(6):242-50
PMID: 21507501
Putting epigenome comparison into practice
Nat Biotechnol., 2010 Oct;28(10):1053-6
PMID: 20944597
The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium
Nat Biotechnol., 2010 Oct;28(10):1045-8
PMID: 20944595
Nat Biotechnol., 2010 Oct;28(10):1097-105
PMID: 20852635